About
Care and contact evaluations require more than binary conclusions. They demand clarity, structure, and defensible decision-making that genuinely serves the Best Interests of the Child. ๐๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ซ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐จ๐๐ฎ๐๐๐ฌ ๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ฆ๐ฉ๐จ๐ซ๐๐ซ๐ฒ, ๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐๐ง๐๐-๐๐๐ฌ๐๐ ๐๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐๐๐ก ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ. Designed for professionals working in high-stakes family law matters, the session offers practical tools to enhance objectivity, guide intervention, and strengthen assessment outcomes. ๐๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ซ ๐๐ซ. ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ก๐จ๐ง๐ฒ ๐๐จ๐ฐ๐ง๐ฌ๐๐ง๐ is a PhD Clinical Psychologist, director of Syntonic, and a post-doctoral research fellow at the University of Pretoria. With over 10 years of experience in family law and psycholegal assessments, he has trained at multiple institutions, including Oxford University, and holds leadership roles in PsySSA and SIPSA. ๐๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ซ ๐๐จ๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฌ The limitations of binary โfit vs unfitโ conclusions in care and contact evaluations. A dimensional, evidence-based model of parenting ability tailored to South Africa. The distinction between Good Parenting and Parental Fitness and how they interact. Using a structured matrix to identify and describe specific parenting competencies. Reducing the impact of unconscious bias in high-conflict and emotionally charged cases. Moving beyond problem identification toward practical, targeted intervention planning. Identifying specific gaps in parenting capacity to support restorative recommendations. Enhancing the clarity, defensibility, and consistency of assessments. Supporting evidence-based outcomes aligned with the Best Interests of the Child.
You can also join this program via the mobile app. Go to the app
